With having read two con articles on sex trafficking I got to see how people view this topic. The first article is "Human Trafficking: A Crime Against Humanity" by Greg Ferency. The second article is "Enslaved in America: Sex Trafficking in the United States" by Tina Frundt. The first article goes by statistics and using the logical approach and facts about sex trafficking while the second article goes by the author having been a victim of sex trafficking telling her own story using pathos.
With reading both I have seen that a pathos is a good way of coming into a topic because it can really catch the attention but no one wants t read a sad story all the time. The reason the second article caught my eye was because the author did tell her story but she also had some logos in her article by showing some statistics and saying that it can happen to anyone and that we do need to try and find a way to help victims of sex trafficking.
In the first article it mostly caught my attention just because that statistics really do shock some people and how these girls get pushed into sex trafficking. It does also say that we need to do something to try and help victims more but with both articles read The pathos article still won me over not just because of the fact that she makes you feel like you have to do something but that she gives resources and ways that we can help people because I have not read many articles that have that same approach. So over all the best article is one that can give examples of people who have gone through the problem they are talking about.
I liked how you used literary terms to explain what was used in both the articles you read, but I think you should also explain how how these girls get pushed into sex trafficking, and what to do in order to help a trafficking victim.
ReplyDeleteI like how you used some good vocabulary to expand on your topic. You should explain a little more on ways for these girls to escape this reality.
ReplyDelete